Previous (Kosi) Next (Ikanirae Seru) Vocabularya -- the
Affixes -alge -- 3s past
|
Nai im seker "Kwe fe vot o tekalge?" Nai nigredher. Im o gensel, nai ik betain kredher sol seon osalge amainta. Fairi nai galesa manitei.
Fe ahukwe, ik patre kagiralge (kagirei to enter) ri ik duom ak
basomalge sol im gege. Dur serilge bid mel lewek heldalge gith
garant.
Vot sol o tekalge nenom taiv e sekem. I didn't say "Did all this happen?" I didn't disbelieve. As a child, I didn't think that my mother was important. Women can't think. One day, my father entered into my house and wanted for me to play. He played for a long time but an evil spirit was summoned (lit. came for beck). The spirit made my father cry profusely. My mother was compared to the spirit... I fled. I couldn't make the spirit stop. I couldn't think well; I had no anger or jealousy for it. That which was done, I have never spoken about it. Grammar notesTense is relative. You have a narrative tense, usually relative to the time of discourse, and within that there's tense relative to the narrative tense. It's awkward in English to have a future from a past perspective; it ends up as "I would have done", "later I did", or some such. In Sturnan, you just use the future tense. SVO word order. However, when you omit a subject pronoun, you can move the object to a position preceeding the verb. When you have a phrase that you want to move without that factor, you can insert the audible trace "e" and move the phrase. It's sort of a topicalization particle, but not really. The aorist tense refers to things that happen periodically, eternally, without surcease, etc. It refers to eternal truths. It's temporally afinitive, is what I'm trying to say. As for the interrogative particle, yes, it makes anything a question without requiring any changes in surface structure. |
© Jan van Steenbergen, Christopher Wright, 24 Aug. 2004